Introduction

Since the recent introduction of selective admission in Dutch higher education, several new selection methods have been implemented. One of these methods is trial-studying, based on the work sample approach often used in personnel selection. In trial-studying, the first course of a study program is mimicked, since performance in the first course has shown to be a good predictor of later academic performance. Specifically, students are asked to study program-specific material and take an exam or do an assignment based on the material.

Objectives

We studied the predictive validity of trial-studying tests, the incremental validity over and above high school GPA, and applicant reactions to trial-studying tests as compared to other selection methods, using samples of Psychology students.

Method

All applicants participated in a selection/matching procedure consisting of a trial-studying test. As criterion measures, academic records were obtained from the university administration. Some applicants completed a questionnaire about selective admission additionally.

Results

Results showed that trial-studying was a good predictor of first-year academic performance, had significant but modest incremental validity over high school GPA, could promote self-selection among applicants, and is perceived as a valid and fair selection method by applicants. Therefore, this method seems very suitable for admission purposes and in study-choice counseling.

Discussion

A possible explanation for these results is that besides ability, personality and motivation are also measured in trial-studying tests, but through shown behavior instead of self-report measures. Furthermore, this method offers applicants insight in the form and content of the study program and provides them with a chance to show their skills, making it a favorable method according to the applicants.